Yo, get on the train!



Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Supreme Moderator

    Join Date
    Mar 01, 2012
    Posts
    8,884
    Gameroom Cash
    $81627
    Ghost Typing Champion! Qwerty Champion!
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Point
    12931
    Rep Power
    10
                                   Female

    “Thailand is the only country in Southeast Asia that was never colonized. . .”

    http://leminhkhai.wordpress.com/2013...ver-colonized/

    That statement, or some variation of it, gets repeated over and over. Several months ago I was in Thailand and saw some advertisement that was encouraging students from other countries to study in Thailand, and one of the “selling points” that it listed was that “Thailand is the only country in Southeast Asia that was never colonized. . .” And how exactly does that make studying there attractive/better?

    I was reminded of that statement the other day when I came across an article in The Straits Times (22 November 1924, pg. 3) about the government of Siam’s hiring of a new “financial advisor” in 1924. This is what it said:

    “The appointment of Sir Edward Cook as Financial Adviser to the Government of Siam is in accordance with the established policy of that Government to look to Great Britain for some of its most important advisory officers, says the Pioneer [a newspaper in British-controlled India].

    “Americans, French and Danish officers are also to be found in the Siamese Service. Thus Danish instructors train the provincial gendarmerie and there is an American Adviser in Foreign Affairs. In addition, a British Judicial Adviser and a French Legislative Adviser, with legal advisers of different nationalities, are developing the administration of justice in the Siamese Courts. British Forest officers are largely employed in the forests and English is the language of commerce, while the Siamese State Bank which was formerly managed by a German, is now managed by an Englishman.”



    Ok, so Siam/Thailand may not have experienced “direct” colonial rule, but with foreigners managing the state bank. . . is it really accurate to say that “Thailand is the only country in Southeast Asia that was never colonized”?

    Add to this the fact that all of those foreigners and the subjects of their colonial empires enjoyed extraterritoriality (i.e., they were not tried in Siamese courts for crimes committed in Siam), and it becomes even harder to say that “Thailand is the only country in Southeast Asia that was never colonized.”

    Yes, Siam/Thailand was never “directly” colonized, but it also wasn’t exactly “sovereign” either. It was something else. And that something else is fascinating to study and think about.

    Does this somehow make it an attractive place to study? Former colonies like Singapore, Malaysia and the Philippines all use aspects of the colonial legacy (namely the English language) to attract foreign students. They do it in a subtle way that emphasizes a perceived “advantage” that has been gained from colonization without talking about the actual fact of colonization.

    In promoting international education in Thailand by saying that “Thailand is the only country in Southeast Asia that was never colonized,” where are people saying that Thailand has gotten its “advantage” from? That’s not clear, just as Thailand’s “non-colonized” past is not very clear either.
    register or log in to view signatures!

  2. #2
    Gone with the Wind

    Join Date
    Mar 04, 2012
    Posts
    6,388
    Gameroom Cash
    $42830
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Point
    12551
    Rep Power
    29
    not a smart come-on
    register or log in to view signatures!

  3. #3
    Unbiased Evil Entity

    Join Date
    Sep 14, 2012
    Location
    อุบลราชธานี
    Posts
    2,520
    Gameroom Cash
    $20274
    Rep Point
    19891
    Rep Power
    28
                                   Female
    It's a nationalistic propaganda since the name change of Siam to Thailand, "Land of the Free". While it wasn't officially colonized, it was under threat consonantly from France and Great Britain, if the World Wars had not happened, it would have surely been colonized. It was the battleground between the French and British control, France was taking piece by piece of the greatest extent of the Siamese Empire, it lost Laos, and Western Cambodia. It lost the Shan areas to Burma under the British direction, along with some Malaysian provinces. Due to the onset of the World Wars, Britain and France redirected their resources back to Europe.

    While the French didn't control Siam, it had sway over judicial matters relating to French colonials who stayed in Thailand, France set up courts and military tribunals. Also Siam, had the private sectors of Britain operating firms there like what you posted above. The situation was akin to the colonization and annexation of Hawaii, how the American private sector slowly took over Hawaii's agriculture sector, and import and exporting, and they wanted more power, and ended forcing the monarchy of Hawaii to abdicate, and set up a Republic controlled by American businessmen. However this didn't happen due to the two World Wars.
    register or log in to view signatures!

  4. #4
    Supreme Moderator

    Join Date
    Mar 01, 2012
    Posts
    8,884
    Gameroom Cash
    $81627
    Ghost Typing Champion! Qwerty Champion!
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Point
    12931
    Rep Power
    10
                                   Female
    I only copied and pasted btw. The original post wasn't written by me.
    register or log in to view signatures!

  5. #5
    Unbiased Evil Entity

    Join Date
    Sep 14, 2012
    Location
    อุบลราชธานี
    Posts
    2,520
    Gameroom Cash
    $20274
    Rep Point
    19891
    Rep Power
    28
                                   Female
    ^^I figured, I'm just referring to what was posted. During World War II, Thailand took on the side of the Japanese, which had subdued the French control over Indochina, so they could remain in control, and it was able to take back Cambodia. On the condition for Thailand to join the United Nations, it had to give back parts of Cambodia back to France under various treaties it had with France dating back to the late 1800s.
    Last edited by Sanaeha; 03-10-2014 at 12:54 PM.
    register or log in to view signatures!

  6. #6
    Responsible Adult

    Join Date
    Jul 04, 2012
    Posts
    798
    Gameroom Cash
    $7969
    Rep Point
    1217
    Rep Power
    7
                                   Male
    So right now who is in control of Thailand? Cause with all the fighting between yellows and reds, its seems foreigners control everything and don't really care about Thailand
    register or log in to view signatures!

  7. #7
    Master

    Join Date
    Jun 19, 2013
    Location
    Nyc
    Posts
    3,246
    Gameroom Cash
    $21302
    Rep Point
    4108
    Rep Power
    13
                                   Male
    thailand was actually ally of japan in world war 2...

    thailand has a unique culture.. i was wish i we could kept our own

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    register or log in to view signatures!

  8. #8
    Baby Cyber

    Join Date
    May 11, 2014
    Posts
    11
    Gameroom Cash
    $560
    Rep Point
    184
    Rep Power
    1
                                   Male
    Quote Quote
    is it really accurate to say that “Thailand is the only country in Southeast Asia that was never colonized”?
    More like a half-truth. It would be more fair to say that Thailand had great diplomatic leveraging with colonial powers. Keep in mind that just a couple centuries before France and the British seized territory from Siam, the Burmese had defeated Siam through war. But they were able to make a great comeback and that is something other nations should all admire.
    register or log in to view signatures!

  9. #9
    Responsible Adult

    Join Date
    Jul 04, 2012
    Posts
    798
    Gameroom Cash
    $7969
    Rep Point
    1217
    Rep Power
    7
                                   Male
    Did thailand even oppose european colonizers?
    register or log in to view signatures!

  10. #10
    Child

    Join Date
    May 29, 2014
    Posts
    74
    Gameroom Cash
    $960
    Rep Point
    93
    Rep Power
    1
                                   Male
    Colonizing a foreign country costs money to a colonizing power. Thailand probably didn't have anything that they wanted back then, either in natural resources or in its functioning as a strategic location.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    register or log in to view signatures!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


About Us

    "EastBound88.com is your premier portal for news and discussion on Asian traditions, contemporary culture, history and politics. Catch up on current events, chat with friends, watch a movie, have a serious debate or hang out in the arcade! Thank you for visiting and enjoy your stay."
EastBound

Quick Links

Follow Us on


Content Managed by
  • EastBound © 2012